fbpx
The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left
Yuval Levin
An acclaimed portrait of Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the… Read more
Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds
Michael Knowles
“Political correctness” has taken politeness and turned it into a… Read more
John Selden and the Western Political Tradition
Ofir Haivry
Legal and political theorist, common lawyer and parliamentary leader, historian… Read more
The Virtue of Nationalism
Yoram Hazony
Nationalism is the issue of our age. In The Virtue of… Read more
The Coming of Neo-Feudalism: A Warning to the Global Middle Class
Joel Kotkin
Following a remarkable epoch of greater dispersion of wealth and… Read more

More Books »

What’s Wrong with Rights? (2020)

Nigel Biggar

Are natural rights ‘nonsense on stilts’, as Jeremy Bentham memorably put it? Must the very notion of a right be individualistic, subverting the common good? Should the right against torture be absolute, even though the heavens fall? Are human rights universal or merely expressions of Western
neo-imperial arrogance? Are rights ethically fundamental, proudly impervious to changing circumstances? Should judges strive to extend the reach of rights from civil Hamburg to anarchical Basra? Should judicial oligarchies, rather than legislatures, decide controversial ethical issues by inventing
novel rights? Ought human rights advocates learn greater sympathy for the dilemmas facing those burdened with government?

These are the questions that What’s Wrong with Rights? addresses. In doing so, it draws upon resources in intellectual history, legal philosophy, moral philosophy, moral theology, human rights literature, and the judgments of courts. It ranges from debates about property in medieval
Christendom, through Confucian rights-scepticism, to contemporary discussions about the remedy for global hunger and the justification of killing. And it straddles assisted dying in Canada, the military occupation of Iraq, and genocide in Rwanda.

What’s Wrong with Rights? concludes that much contemporary rights-talk obscures the importance of fostering civic virtue, corrodes military effectiveness, subverts the democratic legitimacy of law, proliferates publicly onerous rights, and undermines their authority and credibility. The
solution to these problems lies in the abandonment of rights-fundamentalism and the recovery of a richer public discourse about ethics, one that includes talk about the duty and virtue of rights-holders.

Purchase the Book