fbpx
The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics
David Goodhart
A robust and timely investigation into the political and moral… Read more
The Strategy of Denial
Elbridge A. Colby
Elbridge A. Colby was the lead architect of the 2018… Read more
Bad News: How Woke Media Is Undermining Democracy
Batya Ungar-Sargon
Something is wrong with American journalism. Long before “fake news”… Read more
You Will Be Assimilated: China’s Plan to Sino-Form the World
David P. Goldman
China’s 5,000 year-old empire has become the world’s largest economy,… Read more
The Case for Christian Nationalism
Stephen Wolfe
Evangelical elites and the progressive media complex want you to… Read more

More Books »

Sovereignty or Submission (2011)

John Fonte

The International Criminal Court claims authority over Americans for actions that the United States does not define as “crimes.” In short, the Twenty-First Century is witnessing an epic struggle between the forces of global governance and American constitutional democracy. Transnational progressives and transnational pragmatists in the UN, EU, post-modern states of Europe, NGOs, corporations, prominent foundations, and most importantly, in America’s leading elites, seek to establish “global governance.” Further, they understand that in order to achieve global governance, American sovereignty must be subordinated to the “global rule of law.” The U.S. Constitution must incorporate “evolving norms of international law.” Sovereignty or Submission examines this process with crystalline clarity and alerts the American public to the danger ahead.

Global governance seeks legitimacy not in democracy, but in a partisan interpretation of human rights. It would shift power from democracies (U.S., Israel, India) to post-democratic authorities, such as the judges of the International Criminal Court. Global governance is a new political form (a rival to liberal democracy), that is already a significant actor on the world stage. America faces serious challenges from radical Islam and a rising China. Simultaneously, it faces a third challenge (global governance) that is internal to the democratic world; is non-violent; but nonetheless threatens constitutional self-government. Although it seems unlikely that the utopian goals of the globalists could be fully achieved, if they continue to obtain a wide spread influence over mainstream elite opinion, they could disable and disarm democratic self-government at home and abroad. The result would be the slow suicide of American liberal democracy. Whichever side prevails, the existential conflict?global governance versus American sovereignty (and democratic self-government in general) will be at the heart of world politics as far as the eye can see.

Purchase the Book