fbpx
What Do White Americans Owe Black People: Racial Justice in the Age of Post-Oppression
Jason Hill
A philosopher’s passionate call for all Americans to rethink our… Read more
The Unbroken Thread: Discovering the Wisdom of Tradition in an Age of Chaos
Sohrab Ahmari
We’ve pursued and achieved the modern dream of defining ourselves—but… Read more
The Construction of Nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism (The Wiles Lectures)
Adrian Hastings
This interdisciplinary book straddles the fields of history, politics, religion… Read more
Natural Law and Human Rights: Toward a Recovery of Practical Reason
Pierre Manent
Pierre Manent is one of France's leading political philosophers. This… Read more
The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties
Christopher Caldwell
A major American intellectual makes the historical case that the… Read more

More Books »

Separation of Church and State (2002)

Philip Hamburger

In a powerful challenge to conventional wisdom, Philip Hamburger argues that the separation of church and state has no historical foundation in the First Amendment. The detailed evidence assembled here shows that eighteenth-century Americans almost never invoked this principle. Although Thomas Jefferson and others retrospectively claimed that the First Amendment separated church and state, separation became part of American constitutional law only much later.

Hamburger shows that separation became a constitutional freedom largely through fear and prejudice. Jefferson supported separation out of hostility to the Federalist clergy of New England. Nativist Protestants (ranging from nineteenth-century Know Nothings to twentieth-century members of the K.K.K.) adopted the principle of separation to restrict the role of Catholics in public life. Gradually, these Protestants were joined by theologically liberal, anti-Christian secularists, who hoped that separation would limit Christianity and all other distinct religions. Eventually, a wide range of men and women called for separation. Almost all of these Americans feared ecclesiastical authority, particularly that of the Catholic Church, and, in response to their fears, they increasingly perceived religious liberty to require a separation of church from state. American religious liberty was thus redefined and even transformed. In the process, the First Amendment was often used as an instrument of intolerance and discrimination.

Purchase the Book